|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Clinical Window Educational Program is sponsored by GE Healthcare
Clinical Window Web Journal complies with the HON code standard for trustworthy health information: verify here.
|
Low flow anesthesia Ola Stenqvist MD, PhD The whole article available in Inhalation anesthesia and closed system anesthesia are, but for a few years, the same age. Closed or almost closed anesthesia systems have been in use since 1850. At that time, the anesthetic agent was chloroform. It was administered via a closed system, where potassium hydroxide was utilized as a carbon dioxide scavenger. However, that kind of CO2 absorption method did not gain acceptance. Later, a quick and effective method of carbon dioxide absorption was developed when the first soda-lime absorber was introduced in 1917. In the mid 1950’s, when halothane was brought forth, the use of low-flow and closed circle system anesthesia diminished significantly. This was largely due to the inherent problem in the first generation halothane vaporizers, which was the unreliable delivery of vapor at low fresh gas flows (FGF). Introduction of isoflurane in the early 1980’s,
gave way to a renewed interest in low flow and closed circuit anesthesia.
It was further enhanced by the fact that anesthetic agents are atmospheric
pollutants, especially nitrous oxide, halothane, enflurane, and to some
extent isoflurane. The introduction of new low solubility agents, like
desflurane and sevoflurane, have initiated a renaissance in the use of
low flow anesthesia, in order to contain costs associated with adapting
fresh gas flows to patient demand.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||