|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Clinical Window Educational Program is sponsored by GE Healthcare
Clinical Window Web Journal complies with the HON code standard for trustworthy health information: verify here.
|
Indirect calorimetry - Practical applications Chris L. Harris RRCP, RRT The article also available in [Editor’s note: This paper accompanies the Clinical Window presentation at the 16th ESICM Annual Congress in Amsterdam, Netherlands 5-8 October 2003. See also CWWJ’s Internet podium area, where you find author’s presentation slides.] Introduction Since the early 1980’s, the application of Indirect Calorimetry for determining oxygen consumption (V02) and carbon dioxide production (VC02) through metabolic measurements continues to increase. The accuracy of the devices used to obtain these measurements has also become more reliable as the methods for obtaining this information have greatly improved [1,2]. From analyzing expiratory gases with mass spectrometry, to the more recent technology of utilizing mixing chambers, metabolic monitors have now evolved to a small bedside module enabling the clinician to have accurate metabolic measurements for a wide variety of clinical conditions. Some of the initial metabolic monitors were large and cumbersome, as they measured expired respiratory gases collected in a large mixing chamber. They required varying stabilization times after each Fi02 change in order to achieve accurate data [9]. With the development of a bedside metabolic module (M-COVX), which is incorporated into the patient monitoring system, the need of collecting gases in a sample chamber is no longer necessary. This new technology uses a mathematical integration of flow and time synchronized continuous gas sampling and has been shown to be comparable to standard metabolic monitors [1]. What Information can be obtained? The patient’s energy expenditure can be determined by inserting gas exchange measurements into an equation developed by Weir [3]. The information gathered by Indirect Calorimetry not only determines the resting energy expenditure (REE) as a guide to appropriate nutritional support, but also allows the clinician to tailor ongoing nutritional support to meet the patient’s need [4]. With subsequent measurements, adequacy and appropriateness can further be evaluated. In addition to the nutritional information, the relationship between oxygen delivery (DO2) and VO2 can be assessed, as can the cost of breathing. These can be used as a guide to weaning success and outcome [4]. Since 1919, the Harris-Benedict Equation [5] has been used to predict a normal, nourished individual’s REE, but this has been demonstrated to be unreliable in the malnourished and critically ill patient [6]. Correction factors were therefore developed for various clinical conditions to compensate for the inaccurate estimation of REE [7]. However, these values are approximations, and are based on measurements of healthy individuals. They are not capable of determining the true REE in each critically ill patient. Elevated energy expenditure and negative nitrogen balance on the other hand characterize the metabolic derangement of the critically ill patient and these two values correlate with the severity of illness and the extent of injury. [8] Considerations for metabolic monitoring in mechanical ventilation Despite all the advances in metabolic measurements, several clinical and physiological factors can influence the accuracy of the gas exchange measurements. Some of the guidelines to be considered include:
Practical tips for metabolic monitoring with the M-COVX When using any type of new equipment, it takes time to learn all the finer points of the device. Several variables can contribute to inaccurate information being collected. When using any metabolic monitor the clinician must consider the above guidelines to ensure a steady state has been achieved to ensure accuracy. There are some practical considerations of which are also good to bear in mind [12]:
When to use indirect calorimetry? Indirect Calorimetry has many clinical applications. From assessing a patient’s metabolic responses to illness, to measuring the basic nutrition and energy requirements, the applications for this type of technology continue to grow. The bedside clinician must know not only how to obtain accurate results, but also must have a general understanding of how the values obtained can influence the course of the patient’s care plan. Nutrition Overfeeding can result in metabolic, hepatic, and cardiopulmonary complications, including hypercapnia and increased minute ventilation requirements, which may reduce the ability to wean. Since the Respiratory Quotient (RQ) is the ratio of VCO2/VO2, we can determine what energy sources are at work. Underfeeding, which results in the use of endogenous fat stores, should result in decreases in the RQ. Overfeeding promotes lipogenesis, which can cause an increase in the RQ. With the additional measurement of urinary urea excretion, the distinction between protein oxidation and the relative contributions of fat and carbohydrates can also be determined. Optimizing a patient’s nutritional status prior to a weaning trial, which includes modifying the composition and amount of feeding according to the patient’s needs, may contribute to overall success. Ventilatory weaning When initiating a weaning trial, it is helpful to incorporate continuous measurements of VO2 and VCO2. While these values are being monitored, reductions in ventilator support can be implemented while observing VO2 as an indicator of the metabolic cost of breathing [11]. When monitoring a patient’s increase in minute ventilation, consideration of the reason for the acute increase in ventilatory demand must be determined. For example, this increase may be as a result of increase in VCO2 and/or an increase in dead space (Vd/Vt). The underlying cause for each variable may lead to other management interventions or investigations as well as a better understanding of why the patient is unable to wean from the ventilator. Sepsis/Trauma/Surgery/Burns In the critically ill patient, stress imparts a hypermetabolic state. This results in an increase in the stress hormone release (epinephrine, cortisol, glucagons etc.) into the body. The increase in hormone levels results in an elevation of the energy expenditure and increase in glucose, lipid and protein consumption. With monitoring of metabolic values of the patient and the changes that occur as a result of management interventions, an additional piece of information is provided allowing the clinician a more complete picture of the patient’s physiological state. Not only can nutrition be tailored to suit the patient, but monitoring of the metabolic state will demonstrate acute changes in the patient’s metabolism and derangement of gas exchange which may be attributable to a number of factors (i.e., sepsis, fever, acute lung injury.) Therapeutic targets Summary Although the initial development of metabolic monitors was for assessing nutritional regimes, today’s technology with its ability to have instantaneous values at the bedside allows for many more potential areas of diagnostic and therapeutic modalities. Many opportunities exist to measure whether or not a determined ventilatory management is adequate. With the progression of new and varied ventilators and modes of ventilation, permissive hypercapnia, and protective lung strategies for example, more research is required to validate the applicability of Indirect Calorimetry to the critically ill patient to utilize this technology to its fullest potential. References:
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||