|
 |
 |
 |
| Issue
23, December 2007
Control
of Infection and Contamination
|

Presentation slides are available here
(PDF:
2.2 MB)
Above please find an example of the poster to advertise "the Cleanliness
matters" -scientific symposium, which was organized as part of the
scientific program of the 8th Congress of the International Federation
of Infection Control (IFIC) in Budapest, Hungary (October 2007). "Cleanliness
matters" was sponsored by GE Healthcare.

Cleanliness Matters - New research and compelling
economic data in support of infection prevention
Abstract by Dr. Betsy McCaughey, Ph.D.
Introduction - “Hand hygiene is not
enough”
In the United States, infection prevention programs have focused largely
on improving hand hygiene compliance. As iconoclastic as it sounds, hand
hygiene is not enough to stop drug-resistant bacteria from racing through
hospitals. There has been too little attention to four other essential
components: training caregivers on how to keep their hands from becoming
re-contaminated just seconds after washing and gloving, ensuring that
surfaces in hospitals are cleaned effectively, screening incoming patients
for MRSA to identify the source of drug-resistant bacteria, and taking
effective barrier precautions with all colonized patients.
Hospital contamination
Research shows that, in U.S. hospitals, up to three-quarters of patient
rooms are contaminated with MRSA and VRE found on bed rails, over-the-bed
tables, television monitors, telephones, IV poles, and especially under
beds. Caregivers routinely and unknowingly contaminate their hands when
they touch surfaces in patient rooms, even though they have had no direct
patient contact. Not knowing which patients are colonized with drug-resistant
bacteria allows caregivers' clothing and virtually all equipment, including
blood pressure cuffs, EKG wires, pulse oximeters, and stethoscopes to
become vectors of disease. Current cleaning routines in most hospitals
are inadequate. Rigorous, supervised cleaning is shown to reduce the incidence
of VRE and MRSA colonization. Cleaning is highly cost-effective, averting
infections that would cost many times as much to treat as the cleaning
improvements cost.
Impact of screening for MRSA
Screening patients for MRSA on admission is essential, because you cannot
stop the spread of bacteria if you don’t know the source. Universal
screening is also highly cost-effective, returning as much as 20 to 1
payback the first year.
In the United States, the compelling evidence that screening, cleaning
and barrier precautions can reduce infections up to 90% is putting hospitals
in a new legal situation. No longer will they be shielded by the long-held
presumption that infection is an inevitable risk when one is hospitalized.
Infection is the next asbestos, the next major cause of class-action lawsuits
in the U.S.
Presentation slides are available here
(PDF:
2.2 MB)
Last updated: 30
December 2007 |
 |
| Legal
notice |
© GE
Healthcare 2008
ISSN 1795-6269 (Web)
ISSN 1795-6277 (CD) |
Webmaster |
|
 |
|